🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy worked, and revealed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a complex path since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states used their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks reopen.

The US president last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final solution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."